Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Sector
Ruling type
Date
Showing 1-6 of 6 decisions.
In order to conduct its inquiry into whether the tariff constitutes an obstacle and, if so, whether the obstacle is undue, the Agency requires information and evidence. In particular, the Agency requires a complete and detailed response from VIA to the issues identified in the Agency Decision No....
LET-AT-R-147-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-21
The Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) has received your letter of February 22, 2001 and has carefully considered the submissions made therein. VIA Rail Canada Inc. (VIA) has argued the position that the Agency does not have the jurisdiction to proceed with the new inquiry with respect to...
LET-AT-R-146-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-21
In response to LET-W-47-2001, the production order issued by the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) on February 5, 2001 in the above matter, the Pacific Pilotage Authority (the Authority) filed with the Agency a service contract with subsequent amendments between the Authority and the...
LET-W-138-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-19
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
LET-R-128-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
LET-R-127-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
On December 7, 2000 the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) did not, under existing legislation, have the jurisdiction to investigate and determine complaints relating to noise, smoke and vibrations emanating from the day-to-day operations of a federal...
LET-R-123-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-15