Decisions and determinations
Sector
Ruling type
Showing 1-10 of 42 decisions.
BACKGROUND
In Decision No. 12-AT-C-A-2019, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) found that Air Canada did not make reasonable efforts to notify the applicant of the reason for a tarmac delay, as required by Rule 80(C)(3) of its International Passenger Rules and Fares Tariff, NTA(A...
LET-AT-C-A-21-2020 | Letter Decision | 2020-03-23
BACKGROUND
[1] The applicant filed two applications with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency), one against United Airlines and one against Air Canada. The applications each allege that United Airlines and Air Canada, in operating their respective portions of the applicant’s return flights,...
CONF-14-2018 | Letter Decision | 2018-09-14
BACKGROUND
On November 22, 2017, the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) issued Decision No. LET AT-A-78-2017 (Decision) wherein it found that Ms. Jodhan is a person with a disability and has encountered an obstacle to her mobility. The Agency stayed the consideration of the question of whether...
LET-AT-A-11-2018 | Letter Decision | 2018-02-14
BACKGROUND
Ms. Jodhan, who is blind, filed an application with the Agency, pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, as amended (CTA) which related, in part, to an incident she experienced after a flight on Caribbean Airlines Limited carrying on...
LET-AT-A-32-2015 | Letter Decision | 2015-05-22
[1]
Carrie Bavin filed an application pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Canada Transportation Act, S.C., 1996, c. 10, as amended (CTA) against Air Canada concerning the following issue:
Do Air Canada’s policies and procedures regarding the determination of self-reliance of persons who are...
LET-AT-A-19-2015 | Letter Decision | 2015-04-07
[1] In Decision No. LET-AT-A-10-2013 (Opening Pleadings Decision,) the Agency found, on a preliminary basis, that the following accommodation measures relating to cat allergies provided by Air Canada pursuant to Decision No. 227-AT-A-2012, also constitute the appropriate accommodation needed to...
LET-AT-A-82-2013 | Letter Decision | 2013-06-05
By Decision No. LET-AT-A-8-2007 dated January 17, 2008, the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) addressed the July 4, 2007 request by Air Canada and Jazz Air LP, as represented by its general partner, Jazz Air Holding GP Inc. carrying on business as Air Canada Jazz (the carriers) for a stay...
LET-AT-A-30-2008 | Letter Decision | 2008-02-11
Eric Tucker on behalf of Myka Tucker-Abramson
On June 6, 2001, Eric Tucker filed an application with the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) on behalf of his daughter, Myka Tucker-Abramson, concerning the fares charged by Air Canada to provide stretcher service to her after she was injured...
LET-AT-A-319-2005 | Letter Decision | 2005-12-08
Background
The Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) is presently considering applications filed by Eric Norman, Joanne Neubauer and the Council of Canadians with Disabilities (collectively referred to as the CCD applicants); and by Barry Growe, regarding the fares required by Air Canada, Air...
LET-AT-A-128-2005 | Letter Decision | 2005-04-21
Background
On January 6, 2005, Air Canada filed a submission with the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) wherein it states its position that all accessible transportation applications before the Agency against Air Canada and its subsidiaries filed or in relation to incidents which occurred on...
LET-AT-A-54-2005 | Letter Decision | 2005-02-11