Browse decisions and determinations
This database contains all public Decisions, Determinations, Orders and certain interim Decisions made by the Canadian Transportation Agency since 1988. Some decisions are confidential and are not published.
Showing 1-5 of 5 decisions.
This is in reference to the above-noted complaint filed by Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on October 30, 2001. In its application, FE is applying to the Canadian Transportation Agency (the Agency) pursuant to subsections 138(1) and (2) of theCanada Transportation Act (CTA), for an order...
LET-R-443-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-11-09
Reference is made to Trillium Railway Company Limited's solicitors (Trillium) correspondences dated December 27, 2000 and March 5, 2001 and to the City of Welland (the City) response dated March 20, 2001 with respect to the enforcement of Canadian Transportation Agency Order No. 2000-AGR-42.
On...
LET-R-214-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-04-30
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Hudson Bay Railway Company (HBRC) on February 27, 2001. In its application, HBRC requests two Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. First, HBRC asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is, HBRC...
LET-R-128-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
This is in reference to the above-noted application filed by the Ferroequus Railway Company Limited (FE) on February 20, 2001. In its application, FE requests three Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) orders. Firstly, FE asks the Agency for what may be termed a "running rights" order. That is,...
LET-R-127-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-16
On December 7, 2000 the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency) did not, under existing legislation, have the jurisdiction to investigate and determine complaints relating to noise, smoke and vibrations emanating from the day-to-day operations of a federal...
LET-R-123-2001 | Letter Decision | 2001-03-15